Join the ‘Assembly in the Park’ tomorrow

September 3rd, 2010

Priory ParkTomorrow is the Area Assembly for the Stroud Green, Crouch End and Hornsey area, which is being held in Priory Park from 12 noon.   The focus will be on health and sport. There will be lots of opportunities to hear and ask questions about health provision in Haringey, how to register at a GP; penalty shoot outs with the Tottenham Hotspur Foundation and the opportunity to find out about volunteering to help at the Olympics.

Between 12 and 2pm there will be a ‘health fair’ with stalls to find out more about local services and participate in health awareness activities.  This will include information on cancer screening information, diabetes prevention, and stopping smoking.  From 2pm-4pm will be the actual Assembly, which will include a presentation on the area’s new Neighbourhood Health Centre on Park Road, and also the usual opportunities for residents to raise issues from the ’soap box’.

This is the second Assembly we’ve had in the Park, and I hope that this one will be as successful as the ‘intergenerational’ one 2 years ago in getting a wider group of people involved.  Crouch End Councillor Lyn Weber has been the driving force behind these Assemblies and will be chairing as usual.

Comments (0)

Objection submitted to plans for house in garden oasis

August 23rd, 2010

Visiting the site of the proposed new houseYesterday, I submitted an objection to the new ‘backlands’ development proposed for land in-between Elyne Road, Stapleton Hall Road and Quernmore Road in support of local residents.  The plans, which are on the Council’s website, are for a large 5 bedroom house that will completely change the feel of this garden area .

Afte meeting with local residents and visiting the site, I’ve urged the Council to reject the application for a number of reasons:

  1. Poor access:  Access to the site is extremely poor with the path down the side of 2 Elyne less than 1 metre wide in places.  This will make construction very difficult and building materials cannot be delivered to the site without causing a great deal of disruption – as they will have to be unloaded onto the street and then carried up the path.
  2. Loss of green space and natural habitat:  The gardens between Stapleton Hall Road, Quernmore Road and Elyne Road – with this site at its centre – are an important green space for local residents and for birds and animals.  Building in the middle of the site will badly degrade this green space and destroy the habitat of the animals and birds that residents regularly see in their gardens.
  3. This is a greenfield not a brownfield site so building housing here will not help the Council meet its targets for building new homes.
  4. Bulk and density:  The proposed dwelling is too large and bulky for the site – taking up a very large proportion of the plot and goes up very close to the borders of neighbouring gardens.  It is therefore an unacceptable increase in the housing density in the area.
  5. Loss of amenity for residents:  There must be well over a hundred residents living in homes that back on to the site, who would all have their view from their back windows and gardens affected by this development.  Many of these gardens will also duffer from overlooking from the new dwelling.  There would therefore be an unacceptable loss of amenity from residents who will lose some of the enjoyment of their gardens.

The decision on the application won’t be taken till early September and there are already over 40 objections submitted on the Council’s website.

Comments (0)

Katherine helps stop speeding motorists near busy crossing

August 9th, 2010

Katherine with PC Paul KellyAs part of our campaign to slow down traffic on Upper Tollington Park, my colleague Cllr Katherine Reece has joined a local police patrol in the area.   After being alerted to the problem by councillors and local residents, the neighbourhood police team have been taking action to catch people speeding near the pedestrian crossing at the junction with Florence Road.

In this patrol a few weeks ago, four cars were stopped for speeding, a penalty notice was issued for failing to stop at a crossing, and a ticket was given out for using a mobile phone whilst driving. The action is necessary because so many residents have raised concerns about cars driving too fast and failing to stop at the busy crossing, which is a route to a local primary school.

Another partial success from the campaign has been getting electronic speed signs installed, which flash a warning when vehicles break the speed limit.  However, the locations they have been installed don’t seem ideal – as one of them is after the crossing and partially obscured by vegetation.  I’ve contacted the Council asking them to re-assess whether the signs are in the optimum positions!

However, our real aim is to get traffic lights at the crossing – and we are collecting signatures for a petition to make the Council take action.   Please sign up.

Comments (0)

Come on Elyne: residents oppose backlands development

July 30th, 2010

At the site of the proposed developmentYesterday, I investigated the site of a proposed ‘backlands’ development off Elyne Road, which residents who back onto the area are up in arms about. The proposal is to put a large five bedroom house onto the small site just a few meters from the edge of residents’ gardens.  What I hadn’t realised fully until I visited, was just how narrow the access to the site is – less than one metre wide in places, and not enough space for even a wheelbarrow. Residents are concerned this would mean chaos when building materials are delivered to the site.

Last week I attended a Stroud Green Residents Association meeting, where it was clear residents wanted to try to stop the development.  The official deadline for objections is next week, but I’m concerned that the summer holidays mean many people wont get a say.   The site is bound by Elyne, Quernmore and Stapleton Hall Roads, but many people on Quernmore and Stapleton Hall have said they never received any notification from the Council about the planning application.

I’ve written to the Council conveying residents concerns and demanding an extension to the consultation to make sure everyone can have their say.  I’ve also provided them with a list of 13 properties that did not receive any notification from the planning department about the plans.

I can understand why people are so keen to object to this proposal.  I don’t think the site is really suitable for development – and certainly not for a house of this size.  I hope that the consultation period is extended so that all residents can make their views known to the Council.

Comments (1)

Local residents sign up to campaign for safer crossing

July 22nd, 2010

Collecting signatures for the Upper Tollington Park petitionOn Sunday, I joined a group of local residents and Lib Dem activists collecting signatures for our petition to demand a safer crossing for Upper Tollington Park.  We launched the petition online in June (see previous post), but we are also knocking on doors and posting copies of the petition.

It was a fantastically sunny day, and I’ve been sent this great picture of me, John, Dan and Fatuma by the crossing on the corner of Upper Tollington Park and Florence Road, with the petition on our clipboards.  Please sign up online here if you’d like to back the campaign.

Comments (0)

Have your say on new Stationers Park play fort

July 16th, 2010

Stationers fort event flyerYesterday, I spent a few hours helping the Friends of Stationers Park get the word out about the final consultation event on the Stationers Park Play Area. The event will be in the play area on Monday (19th) between 3pm and 7pm and will be a great chance for everyone to look at the latest versions of the plans.

At the last consultation session in May (see previous post)  it was clear that there was strong support for the new play area to emulate the old fort design that is so well loved – but to improve on it and create something even more fun and adventurous.  Working with local children, Groundwork (the charity that is designing the new play area) has now come up with three different fort designs, and they now want the views of the local community on these options.

Please do bring your family along and have your say on this brilliant project, which should ensure another generation of local children can play on a fort at Stationers Park.

Comments (0)

Review of residents’ Controlled Parking Zone to start this summer

July 12th, 2010

Map of the different review areasEarlier this month I attended a meeting with the parking officers in charge of the review of the Finsbury Park Controlled Parking Zone (CPZ), and the new cabinet member in charge of parking Cllr Nilgun Canver.  The officers came armed with maps of the proposed consultation areas, which they’d drawn up following a previous meeting (see picture).

The full consultation with residents will happen in the Autumn, with residents inside the CPZ being asked if they still support the CPZ and whether they want the rules changed (different hours and different sub-zones within the CPZ). Residents outside will be asked if they want the CPZ extended, and what the hours of the extension should be.

It is proposed that the consultation will extend up to and including Ridge Road.  Roads to the north of Ridge Road would be notified about the consultation, but as there is no strong campaign for a CPZ in those roads the Council do not plan to include them in the formal consultation area.  There will be a simultaneous consultation on extending the Crouch End CPZ which will cover Ferme Park Road and and roads to the west.

Over the next few months the Council will be drawing up the consultation questions and finalising the consultation zones, and will be running focus groups of local residents from different roads to help them with this.  If you want to take part in the focus groups then please get in contact.

The process is very ponderous, and any changes or extensions to the CPZ will not be implemented till 2011.  However, these focus groups should hopefully mean that the consultation works better and that there is less criticism of the consultation process than last time.

Comments (3)